Journal of Nursing

Effectiveness of case management on clinical outcomes in women with cervical cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Huafeng Yang, Helen Franks, Xiaohua Xie

Abstract


Background

Cervical cancer is the fourth common type of cancer and can be deteriorated by insufficient care management. Case management, a collaborative process utilising available resources to satisfy individual health needs and attain cost-effective outcomes, has been applied in management of cervical cancer.

Aims

To evaluate the effectiveness of case management on clinical outcomes in patients with cervical cancer, compared with non-case management care.

Methods

The following databases were searched: Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science. Grey literature searches were performed as well until September 2017. For continuous outcomes, the mean difference or standardised mean difference along with 95% confidence interval were extracted; for dichotomous data, the corresponding odds ratio with 95% CI was calculated. A fixed- or random-effect model is applied for meta-analysis when appropriate. Heterogeneity was assessed by the  statistics.

Results

Ten studies were included in this review, comprising four randomised controlled trials and six non-randomised studies and involving 5980 participants with low to moderate overall risk of bias. Case management interventions varied in the models and contents. During diagnosis identification phase, the case management groups were improved significantly in adherence to follow-up in six months and over twelve months; in timely diagnosis resolution in two months, twelve months and eighteen months; and in time to initiation of colposcopy follow-up and time to diagnosis resolution. During treatment period, case management was found more effective at the following items: the rate of patients continuing treatment in the same institute; the rate of planned readmission for active treatment in fourteen days; the rate of planned readmission for active treatment in 15-30 days. There were no statistical differences in treatment phase between groups in the rate of prolonged hospitalisation, the rate of nonadherence to treatment, and the rate of unplanned hospital readmission. Several studies concluded that age, insurance status, literacy ability, and severity of screening abnormality may affect follow-up behaviour.

Conclusion

Relatively robust evidence is provided by several high-quality studies that case management improves clinical outcomes in cervical cancer at specified time points. Age, insurance status, literacy ability, and severity of abnormality affect the adherence to follow-up and treatment. Whereas in view of heterogeneity in the components of intervention and outcome measures across the included trials, more rigorously-designed studies are needed in the future to explore further cost-effective protocols of case managements maximising adherence to follow-up and treatment, and relevant barriers should be investigated further as well. 


Keywords


Cervical cancer; case management; systematic review;meta-analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Al-Mansour Z, Verschraegen C. Locally advanced cervical cancer: what is the standard of care?. [Review]. Current Opinion in Oncology, 2010,22(5),503-512. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32833af426.

Aubin M, Giguère A, Martin M, et al. Interventions to improve continuity of care in the follow-up of patients with cancer. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012, 7. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007672.pub2.

Bachmann-Mettler I,Steurer-Stey C,Senn O, et al. Case management in oncology rehabilitation (CAMON): the effect of case management on the quality of life in patients with cancer after one year of ambulant rehabilitation. Trials,2011,12,103. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-12-103.

Battaglia T,BakS,Heeren T, et al. Boston patient navigation research program: the impact of navigation on time to diagnostic resolution after abnormal cancer screening. Journal Of General Internal Medicine, 2012,27,S133-S134.

Chen YC,Chang YJ,Tsou YC,et al. Effectiveness of nurse case management compared with usual care in cancer patients at a single medical center in Taiwan: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Health Services Research, 2013,13(202). doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-202.

Clark CR,Baril N,Hall A, et al. Case management intervention in cervical cancer prevention: the Boston REACH coalition women's health demonstration project. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 2011,5(3), 235-247. doi:10.1353/cpr.2011.0034.

Denny L. Control of cancer of the cervix in low- and middle-income countries. [Review]. Annals of Surgical Oncology,2015, 22(3), 728-733. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-4344-8.

Ell K,Vourlekis B,Muderspach L. Abnormal cervical screen follow-up among low-income Latinas: Project SAFe. Journal of Womens Health & Gender Based Medicine,2002,11(7),639-651.

Ebisch RMF,Rovers MM,Bosgraaf RP, et al. Evidence supporting see-and-treat management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,2016,123(1),59-66 58p.doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13530.

Engelstad L,Stewart S,Nguyen B, et al. Abnormal Pap smear follow-up in a high-risk population. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention,2001,10(10),1015-1020.

Fernández ME,Gonzales A,Tortolero-Luna G,et al. Effectiveness of Cultivando la Salud: a breast and cervical cancer screening promotion program for low- income Hispanic women. American journal of public health,2009,99(5),936-943. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.136713.

Higgins JPT,Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

Iliffe S,Robinson L,Bamford C, et al. Introducing case management for people with dementia in primary care: A mixed-methods study. British Journal of General Practice,2014,64(628),e735-e741. doi:10.3399/bjgp14X682333.

Jennings-Sanders A,Kuo YF,Anderson ET,et al. How do nurse case managers care for older women with breast cancer? Oncology nursing forum,2005,32(3),625.

Krok-S choen JL,Oliveri JM,Paskett ED. Cancer care delivery and women's health: the role of patient navigation. Frontiers in Oncology, 2016, 6, 2. doi:10.3389/fonc.2016.00002.

Lin HY,Chen SC, Peng HL,et al. Effects of a case management program on patients with oral precancerous lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016,24(1), 275-284. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2787-5.

Markossian TW,Darnell JS,Calhoun EA. Follow-up and timeliness after an abnormal cancer screening among underserved, urban women in a patient navigation program. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention,2012,21(10),1691-1700. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0535.

Meisinger C,Stollenwerk B,Kirchberger I, et al. Effects of a nurse-based case management compared to usual care among aged patients with myocardial infarction: results from the randomized controlled KORINNA study. BMC geriatrics,2013,13,115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-13-115.

Miller SM,Hui SK,Wen KY, et al. Tailored telephone counseling to improve adherence to follow-up regimens after an abnormal pap smear among minority, underserved women. Patient Education & Counseling,2013,93(3),488-495. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.008.

Miller SM,Siejak KK,Schroeder CM et al. Enhancing adherence following abnormal Pap smears among low-income minority women: a preventive telephone counseling strategy. Journal of the National Cancer Institute,1997, 89(10),703-708.

NICE (National Institute for Health and Excellence and Social Care Institute for Excellence). Dementia: Supporting People with Dementia and Their Carers in Health and Social Care. 2006. Retrieved 15 Oct., 2017, from http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg42.

Percac-Lima S,Benner CS,Lui R, et al. The impact of a culturally tailored patient navigator program on cervical cancer prevention in Latina women. Journal of Women's Health,2013,22(5),426-431. doi:10.1089/jwh.2012.3900.

Tarasenko YN,Schoenberg NE,Bennett KL. The emergency department as a potential intervention recruitment venue among vulnerable rural residents. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health,2011,2(2),77-81. doi:10.1177/2150131910391534.

Vourlekis B,Ell K,Padgett D. Evidence- based assessment in case management to improve abnormal cancer screen follow-up. Health and social work,2005,30(2),98-106.

Wulff CN,Thygesen M,Søndergaard J, et al. Case management used to optimize cancer care pathways: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 2008, 227. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-227.

Yabroff KR,Zapka J,Klabunde CN, et al. Systems strategies to support cancer screening in U.S. primary care practice. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention,2011,20(12), 2471-2479. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0783.

YanYH,Hsu S,Fang SC, et al. Establishment of an integrated management model for the secondary prevention of cervical cancer - an experience in Taiwan hospital. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention,2009,10(1),159-162.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/jn.v7i1.140

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Huafeng Yang, Helen Franks, Xiaohua Xie

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.