Construction of the evaluation index of nursing quality based on the main problems
Abstract
Objective To take the main problems of nursing quality as the guide, construct corresponding nursing quality inspection and evaluation indexes, and incorporate their application and incorporation quality into the weakness inspection at night and on holidays, so as to achieve the purpose of supervising nursing quality from the weakness. Methods The literature research method and expert consultation method were applied to construct the primary and secondary inspection evaluation indicators, and the secondary inspection indicators were tested for reliability and validity. Results The expert coordination coefficient (Kendall W ) was 0.345; means ranged from 4.778 to 5.00; coefficients of variation (CV) 0.000% to 22.050%; the Kendall coordination coefficient test was used to test the consistency of the study evaluation, and the Kendall coordination coefficient test showed significance (p=0.000<0.05). The standardised Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.926, which was greater than 0.9. Bartlett's test of sphericity (p=0.000<0.05), with a KMO value of 0.897, had a KMO value greater than 0.8. Conclusions Experts were consistent in their evaluations, and the quality of the check evaluation reliability and validity was high and well suited to extracting information.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Pan HY. Discussion on the whole-process control mode of night nursing quality [J]. Nurse Journal, 2011,26 (8): 694-696.
Fang SQ. Study on the application of PDCA management in patient satisfaction evaluation [J]. Nursing Research, 2016,30 (10): 928-930.
(Italy) Vifredo Pareto compiled by Xu Qingsheng. The 80-80 rule that saves time and effort [M]. Taiyuan: Shanxi Education Press, 2010.
Bu FH. Study on Accounting Information System Security Based on Pareto Law [J]. Inner Mongolia Science, Technology and Economy, 2010, 24:17-18.
Zhou YZ, Liu H. The Application of Paretogram Analysis in the Safety Management of Power Boiler [J]. Safety, 2011,32 (09): 8-10.
Brynjolfsson E, Hu Y, Simester D. Goodbye pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales[J]. Manage Sci, 2011, 57(8): 1373-1386．
Reed WJ, Jorgensen M. The double Pareto-lognormal distributionA new parametric model for size distribution[J]. Commun StatTheor M, 2004, 33(8): 1733-1753.
Zhang Y, Tan KX, Li PZ, et al. Application of Pareto Chart and Fishbone Diagram to Analyzing the Operation of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety Management System[J]. J Univ South China(Sci Technol), 2015, 29(4):22-26．
Jiang ZM. Speech at the seventh Annual Meeting of the China Quality Association, March 15,1989.
Kenneth L, Melkiory C. The use of direct clinician observation and vignettes for health services quality evaluation in developing countries. Social Science & Medicine, 2005, 61: 1944–1951.
Rogowski JA., et al. Indirect vs Direct Hospital Quality Indicators for Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants. Journal of the American Medical Association2004, 291: 202–209.
Peterson, E., et al. Procedural Volume as a Marker of Quality for CABG Surgery. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2004, 291: 195–201.
Rosenthal MB, et al. Paying for Quality: Providers’ Incentives for Quality Improvement. Health Affairs, 2004, 23(2), 127–141.
Nauceur J, Mohammed C. Comparing the quality of private and public hospitals’, Managing Service Quality, 2003, 13(4): 290-299.
Tolga Taner, Jiju Antony. Comparing public and private hospital care service quality in Turkey. Leadership in Health Services. Bradford, 2006, 19(2): 1-10.
Gavriel Meirovich, Yael Brender-Ilan, Alexander Meirovich. Quality of hospital service: the impact of formalization and decentralization. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. Bradford, 2007, 20(3)240-252.
Stephen Campbell, Andrea Steiner, Judy Robison, et al. Do Personal Medical Services contracts improve quality of care? A multi-method evaluation. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005, 10(1): 31-39.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/jn.v12i2.279
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ye Jin, Jin Zheng, Zongping Hu, Nan Wang, Jie Liu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
