Journal of Nursing

Comparison of the effectiveness of two cranial external drainage systems in patients with increased intracranial pressure in patients with cranial external drainage

Qiming Yan

Abstract


Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of two kinds of extracranial drainage systems for intracranial hypertension caused by cerebrospinal fluid, cerebral hemorrhage, hematoma and cerebral cyst. Methods: Patients with cerebral cyst hydrocephalus
or intracranial hemorrhage requiring external drainage were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The total effective
rate, physical and chemical properties, complications and vital signs of the products were compared between the two groups. Results: Experimental group and control group each included 120 patients. In the experimental group, the extracranial drainage system could be used for
intracranial drainage in patients with increased intracranial pressure caused by cerebrospinal fluid, cerebral hemorrhage, hematoma, and cerebral cyst effusion. The effective rate of the instrument was 100% during clinical trial, and the incidence of complications during the trial was 0,
which had no difference compared with the control group. Conclusion: The extracranial drainage system is effective and safe for the patients
with increased intracranial pressure caused by cerebrospinal fluid, cerebral hemorrhage, hematoma and cerebral cyst.

Keywords


Extracranial Drainage System; Increased Intracranial Pressure; Therapeutic Effect


Included Database


References


[1] Zhou Chaoyang, Zhu Ronglan, Jiang Xingxing,et al. Comparison of the efficacy of neuroendoscopic surgery combined with external ventricular drainage and external ventricular drainage alone in the treatment of ventricular hemorrhage[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical

Neurosurgery,2021,26(02):77-78+81.DOI:10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2021.02.004.

[2] Chen Mo. Effects of stereotactic minimally invasive soft-channel puncture hematoma drainage for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients on their perioperative indexes and neurological functions[J]. Electronic Journal of Integrative Cardiovascular Disease of Chi-

nese and Western Medicine,2021,9(25):44-46+43.DOI:10.16282/j.cnki.cn11-9336/r.2021.25.015.

[3] Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, Goldman DL, Graybill JR, Hamill RJ, Harrison TS, Larsen RA, Lortholary O, Nguyen MH,

Pappas PG, Powderly WG, Singh N. Sobel JD, Sorrell TC. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010

update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Feb 1;50(3):291-322. doi: 10.1086/649858. PMID: 20047480;

PMCID: PMC5826644.

[4] Zhou Guangping, Shui Zheng, Mao Yuling, et al. Effect of craniotomy hematoma removal and minimally invasive conical cranial

soft-channel external drainage in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage and its effect on serum Cor, Ang Ⅱ, NSE, and S100β[J].

Journal of Chronic Disease,2021,22(11):1634-1637.DOI:10.16440/J.CNKI.1674-8166.2021.11.03.

[5] Sun Xin.Nursing effect experience of 45 patients after external ventricular drainage[J]. China Medical Guide,2019,17(23):236-237.

[6] Chen Shiling,TANG Yingxin,WANG Wenzhi,et al. Research progress of puncture and suction instruments for minimally invasive hematoma removal surgery in cerebral hemorrhage[J]. Neurological Injury and Functional Reconstruction,2023,18(10):608-610.

DOI:10.16780/j.cnki.sjssgncj.20230657.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/nursing.v13i3.353

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Qiming Yan