Nursing Empathy and Prosociality: The Relationship
Abstract
The psychological and ethical theories affirm that the empathy favors the prosocial behavior. We hypothesized that the evaluation of the axiological estimate of professional values gives us indirect data regarding the ethical motivations of the prosocial behavior. An observational, transverse, descriptive study has been carried out with a sample of 188 professional and students of Nursing. This paper aims to describe in the sample selected, the result of applying the Professionals Ethical Values Scale as well as the scores of dimensions of empathy reached by Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and to analyze if there is a statistical relationship between the four variables of empathy of IRI scale and the results of Professionals Ethical Values Scale. Descriptive variables were calculated. It was applied normality test of Kolmogorov-Smirnov and the Shapiro-Wilk test. Finally were calculated the correlation between variables with Spearman's Rho test. The values of abnegation and altruism are not among the highest rated. A statistically significant relationship was obtained between three dimensions of empathy and the result of the estimation of professional ethical values by nurses and nursing students. The results suggest that there seems to be a significant relationship between empathy and prosociality, which agrees with the theoretical constructs that explain human moral development. This relationship has to be checked with new research.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Spinrad TL, 2007, "Prosocial Development". Handbook of Child Psychology. Published Online: 1 JUN 2007. doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0311.
Santrock JW, 2007, A Topical Approach to Life Span Development 4th Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 489-91.
Morse J, Anderson G, Botter J, et al, 1992, Exploring empathy: a conceptual fit for nursing practice? Image-the journal of nursing scholarship, vol. 24: 273-80.
Brown SL, Cialdini RB. Funtional motives and funtional consecuences of prosocial behavior. In Schroeder DA, Graziano G, 2015, The Oxford HandBook of Prosocial Behavior. Oxford University Press, 346-61. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.001.0001
Cortina A, 1997, Las claves de la ética sanitaria. En: Arroyo MP, Cortina A, Torralba MJ, Zugasti J, editores. Ética y legislación en enfermería. McGraw-Hill Interamericana, Madrid.
Falcó Pegueroles A, 2005, Cuidar siguiendo los valores y principios éticos propios de la enfermería. Enfermería Clínica, vol. 15(5): 287-90.
Eisenberg, N, 2000, Emotion, Regulation and Moral Development. Anual Review of Psychology, vol. 51: 665-97.
Batson D, Batson J, Slingsby J, Harrell K, Peekna H, Todd M. Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis, 1991, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 61(3): 413-26.
Hoffman LM , 1987, La aportación de la empatía a la justicia y al juicio moral. En N. Eisenberg y J. Strayer (eds.), La empatía y su desarrollo. Desclée de Brouwer, Bilbao, 59-93.
Hoffman ML, 1990, Empathy and Justice Motivation. Motivation and Emotion, vol. 14 (2): 151-72.
Bandura A, Barbaranelli C, Caprara GV, Pastorelli C, 1996, Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 77(2): 364-74.
Caprara GV, Pastorelli C, 1993, Early emotional instability, prosocial behavior, and aggression: some methodological aspects. European Journal of Personality, vol. 7: 19-36.
Fuentes MJ, Apodaka P, Etxebarría I, Ledesma AR, López F, Ortiz MJ, 1993, Empatía, role-taking y concepto de ser humano como factores asociados a la conducta prosocial-altruista. Infancia y Aprendizaje, vol. 61: 73-87.
López F, Apodaka, P, Eceiza A, Etxebarría F, Fuentes MJ, Ortiz MJ, 1994, Para comprender la conducta altruista. Edit. Verbo Divino, Navarra.
Ortiz MJ, Apodaca P, Etxebarría I, Ezeiza A, Fuentes MJ, López F, 1993, Algunos predictores de la conducta prosocial-altruista en la infancia: empatía, toma de perspectiva, apego, modelos parentales, disciplina familiar e imagen del ser humano. Revista de Psicología Social, vol. 8: 83-98.
Davis MH, 1983, Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 44(1): 113-26.
Carlo G, Raffaelli M, Laible DJ, Meyer KA, 1999, Why are Girls Less Physically Aggressive than Boys? Personality and Parenting Mediators of Physical Aggression. Sex Roles, vol. 40 (9/10): 711-29.
Hoffman LM, 1987, La aportación de la empatía a la justicia y al juicio moral. En N. Eisenberg y J. Strayer (eds.), La empatía y su desarrollo. Desclée de Brouwer, Bilbao, 59-93.
Hoffman ML, 1989, Empathic emotions and justice in society. Social Justice Research, vol. 3: 283-311.
Bandura A, 1987, Pensamiento y Acción. Edit. Martínez Roca, Barcelona.
Batson CD, Coke JS, 1981, Empathy: a source of altruistic motivation for helping? L.E.A, New Jersey.
Sobral J, Romero E, Luengo A, Marzoa J, 2000, Personalidad y conducta antisocial: amplificadores individuales de los efectos contextuales. Psicothema, vol. 12 (4): 661-70.
Mestre Escrivá MV, Samper García P, Frías Navarro MD, 2002, Procesos cognitivos y emocionales predictores de la conducta prosocial y agresiva: La empatía como factor modulador. Psicothema, vol. 14(2): 227-23.
Slettmyr A, Schandl A, Arman M, 2017 Jan, The ambiguity of altruism in nursing: A qualitative study. Nurs Ethics. doi: 10.1177/0969733017709336. [Epub ahead of print]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/jn.v7i1.129
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 José María Galán González-Serna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
